Thursday 29 September 2011

FINALLY !! The TRUTH Comes Out !




From the horse's mouth, the TRUTH comes out;

The reality and the root-cause of "Jewish-Israeli" racism is exposed, by no other the Gideon Levy,

But please do NOT believe it, because of the high risk of being labelled as, "racist" and "anti-Semite"

I wonder, since Gideon Levy's article is exposing much of what I have been writing about, will he be added to the list of "racists" and "anti-Semites" by the Jewish anti-Zionist "supporters"?





Jewish people are just that, people, and far from chosen


www.haaretz.com

The idea that we are members of the chosen people is deeply ingrained, not only in the Jewish tradition, but also among modern and ostensibly secular Israelis. http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/jewish-people-are-just-that-people-and-far-from-chosen-1.388870

By Gideon Levy

On Saturday, the prayer was once again read in the synagogues. "You have chosen us from among all the nations" was once again heard all over the land. The idea that we are a special nation was once again specifically expressed, as is often the case in prayers and in the Torah, and not only on Yom Kippur.

But the idea that we are members of the chosen people is planted far deeper, and not only in Jewish tradition and among those who observe it - modern and ostensibly secular Israel believes in it with all its heart. There are not many other ancient Jewish ideas as deeply implanted in the contemporary Israeli experience as the idea that the "Jewish people," however it is interpreted, is better than any other nation. If you scratch beneath the skin of almost any Israeli, you'll discover that he really is convinced of that: We're the best; the "Jewish genius" is the most successful; the Israel Defense Forces is the most moral. Nobody will tell them different, we're simply the best in the world.

This is not only unnecessary and groundless arrogance, it's also an extremely dangerous idea that enables Israel to behave as it does, with blatant disregard of the world's feelings. Nor does it lack benighted ultra-nationalist and racist foundations. It's good and well that a nation considers itself successful. The Jewish people have many reasons for that, of course, and many accomplishments of which to boast, as does the State of Israel, which is a kind of wonder, almost a miracle. But among all these, prominent in its absence is an equally important national trait: modesty. It is hard to accuse the Israelis of having it.

At the basis of Israeli arrogance lies the idea that this really is a special nation with special traits that are shared by no other nation. You can see that among Israeli travelers abroad; you can hear it from anyone who comes into contact with foreigners; you can sense it in the deeper currents of Israeli policy. The Americans are "foolish," the Indians are "primitive," the Germans are "square," the Chinese are "strange," the Scandinavians are "naive," the Italians are "clowns" and the Arabs are ... Arabs.

Only we know what's good for us, and not only for us but for the entire world. There is nothing like Israeli ingenuity, there is nothing similar to Jewish intelligence, the Jewish brain invents new ideas for us like no other brain, because we're the best, bro.

There are many opportunities to see this idea in action. The latest example not only erupted from the synagogues on Yom Kippur, but was observed on the eve of the holiday, when we heard the very happy news that another Israeli scientist had won the Nobel Prize. And it really was heartwarming: Prof. Dan Shechtman certainly deserves the prize, but Israel does not deserve the sentimental national celebration that immediately erupted. In a society where blunders and failures are always the responsibility of the individual, achievements are nationalized and belong to us, all of us.
We were all together on April 8, 1982, in Shechtman's laboratory in Maryland when he first observed his quasicrystal; we're all with him now, on the way to Stockholm.
The achievement of the individual immediately becomes a communal achievement, the communal achievement immediately becomes more irrefutable proof of Israel's superiority. "The crystal is ours;" "The secret of our existence;" "National pride;" and the "Israeli brain" screamed the headlines in a tasteless and unfounded display at the news of the individual prize.



In order to confirm the baseless notion that we are all partners to Shechtman's impressive achievement, they immediately come with the calculations: how many Nobel Prizes "we" have won, and where that places us relative to the size of the population. The list of Jewish Nobel laureates throughout the generations is immediately put on display, as though saying that they won because they were Jewish. Every prize that is added to the collection immediately reinforces the idea that it's a matter of clear genetic superiority. That is the other side of racism - on the one hand, trampling the other; on the other, we praise and exalt the "chosen people" above everyone else. Two sides of the same coin: unconscionable racism.

We should, of course, continue to read the prayer "You have chosen us." It is part of the Jewish heritage. But Israel should long since have freed itself from its contemporary and practical meaning. No, we are not a special nation - we haven't been for a long time. Nor are we chosen, certainly not above other nations. Therefore, the day after this Yom Kippur, with another Nobel Prize for an Israeli, let's try to be at least a nation like all other nations.
.





Another striking confession comes from no other than the former Director of National Affairs for the American Jewish Committee, one of the largest and most powerful Jewish organization in America Stephen Steinlight

"I'll confess it, at least: like thousands of other typical Jewish kids of my generation, I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a quasi-separatist. Every summer for two months for 10 formative years during my childhood and adolescence I attended Jewish summer camp. There, each morning, I saluted a foreign flag, dressed in a uniform reflecting its colors, sang a foreign national anthem, learned a foreign language, learned foreign folk songs and dances, and was taught that Israel was the true homeland. Emigration to Israel was considered the highest virtue, and, like many other Jewish teens of my generation, I spent two summers working in Israel on a collective farm while I contemplated that possibility. More tacitly and subconsciously, I was taught the superiority of my people to the gentiles who had oppressed us. We were taught to view non-Jews as untrustworthy outsiders, people from whom sudden gusts of hatred might be anticipated, people less sensitive, intelligent, and moral than ourselves. We were also taught that the lesson of our dark history is that we could rely on no one."







.

3 comments:

nysoulcontrolla said...
MEK NEWS -Open Letter to Catherine Ashton on behalf of the families of Rajavi’s hostages in Camp Ashraf http://thenakedfacts.blogspot.com/2011/10/open-letter-to-catherine-ashton-on.html (MUST SEE)

IRAN- Islamic world media urged to help defuse western media propaganda ( -VS- '''GCC MEDIA AND NATO OPEN PARTNERSHIP ? ''' ) http://thenakedfacts.blogspot.com/2011/10/media-in-changing-worldperspectives.html

Amnesty International’s Allegations on Abuse Practices against Patients at Hospitals Fabrication http://thenakedfacts.blogspot.com/2011/10/amnesty-internationals-allegations-on.html

Brazilians Get Ready to Dig Up the Truth(ON US BACKED COUP IN 60'S AND BEYOND)BUT WAIT,THERE IS A''CATCH'' http://thenakedfacts.blogspot.com/2011/10/brazilians-get-ready-to-dig-up-truthon.html

SYRIA - MASS PRO ASSAD RALLY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFvYrKakR0k Pro Assad Carnival in Omaween square http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lve7nv7hnwg
PRO-ASSAD DEMOS http://www.youtube.com/user/bashar0g0w#p/u/1/tFcJjqOQTgI
SYRIA- Umayyad square - Damscus : Massive Gathering in support of president Bashar Al-Assad - Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOHIMt6yG-M&feature=channel_video_title PART 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhqmuyhnDns&feature=channel_video_title "
ELROY said...
Home [universal-peace.com


Truth Counts: DON’T COUNT ON GETTING IT

Purchase Truth Counts: DON’T COUNT ON GETTING IT or any other title with 15% off with coupon code
Hurry ...

REMEMBER WHEN END THE WARS AND CREATE ENERGY JOBS WAS THE AGENDA?
What happened, just how did lobbies and profiteers continue to control government?
None of you pay attention, but wonder why we keep sliding down the tube of ill fate. Stay in denial that our congress is Israeli occupied, and such continues.
Subject: Purchase "Truth Counts: DON’T COUNT ON GETTING IT"
www.universal-peace.com (Home)

Unemployment, and the coming elections 2012.
What can we, the average American, do to bring back our jobs and force
government to work for us?
First boycott the Republican party who gave tax cuts to corporations that
then out-sourced our jobs.
Boycott all products and merchandise imported from China, and other foreign
countries, until our
unemployment rate is at or below 7%. In fact a bill should be proposed for
such and made into law.
Demand tax reform, and drastic change in our foreign policies including
foreign aid to any state
that is violating international law and/or illegal occupation.
THE TOP TEN ISSUES FOR 2012
1. Audit the fed.
2. Total international investigation of 911, the actual facts, presently
undisclosed.
3. End ear marks, reform GOVERNMENT, and investigate all lobby activity.
4. End the occupation of Palestine and the Israeli atrocities.
5. Hold each and every elected
official accountable. Prosecute
corruption & criminal activity.
6. Tax reform, fair taxation for all. No exemptions.
7. End to private military & police agencies, paid by tax-payer monies.
8. All jobs paid by American tax-payers, shall be American citizens. No duel
citizenship employees at top security positions.
9. End the Wars now, bring home the troops.
10. Transparency, break up the media conglomerates controlling the News
received by the general public.
How important is our constitution and maintaining Democracy to you??
Will it take a third party to break the corporate hold on Washington ??
Go to: www.universal-peace.com
Google: Ronald L. Waldron
Instead of creating jobs and solving the problems of middle-class working
families, some state politicians are in a real state of denial. They've been
saying "thank you" to the corporate CEOs who financed their 2010 election
victories by pushing legislation to cut good jobs, lower wages, threaten job
safety and weaken unions.
In state after state, newly elected Republican legislators and governors
have been playing politics as usual by launching a coordinated attack on
working families designed to swell already-record-size corporate profits and
keep those CEO bonuses coming. These politicians aren't offering up their
own pay or pensions—they want working families to bear the burden.

With Congress spending TRILLIONS of taxpayer dollars and the
Federal Reserve literally creating money out of thin air, it's never been
more important you and I force Congress to Audit the Fed.


Audit the Fed,a full-scale audit? Close all tax loop holes, no more exemptions.
"Audit the Federal Reserve"
Petition to the US Congress
ELROY said...
WHO IS ANTI-SEMITIC, WHO IS ANTI-AMERICAN ??

68% of the people of Jewish Faith residing in America, are opposed to the Lobby (AIPAC) and
other so called Jewish organizations.
They do not believe that the actions of Israel are
justified in any way. Nor do they want such government and organizations associated as
being a part of their faith.
Are they really anti-Semitic as others are accused.
Or are they proud to be American, and concerned
about the direction of such foreign policy as lead
by a lobby and its money trail.

They see this administration, the Zionist movement
the same as we do. Anti-American.

BIGGEST STRIKE IN AMERICAN HISTORY COMING!!

We the American people demand that the WAR be ended and our troops be brought home.

We are prepared to STRIKE and cause complete
shut down.

We expect the Senate and House to demand
such end to the atrocities committed.

No more appropriation bills, no more immigration bills, no more spending at all until the vetoed bill
is resubmitted and signed.

No action on any issue until this Illegal War Issue
is resolved.

Petition all agencies, offices, unions, organizations,
and fraternities regarding an end to the conflict.

We Americans know that 911 happened.
We also know that it could have been prevented.
We know something could happen again, and the
necessary steps to secure us and borders has not
happened. We are no safer, in fact are less safe.
We know that Israel, has caused MOST ALL the
problems in the Middle East.
None of you talk about steps to be taken against
Israel. Their aggression and terror activities for
59 years now.
We do not want to continue giving and giving to that
regime, as if they were another part of the USA, they
are not, nor do we want them to be.
We understand, more then you corrupt officials that
accept AIPAC money & support, how and why we
there.
The fear factor of terrorist, is not so much about our
safety as it is Israel's.
We do know that Iraq had nothing to do with 911, and
there is question as to who was. Answer the questions
about Mossad agents, and Saudi royalty and flights.
You want to trace history and other wars.
Have we ever pre-empted an attack under such pretense
in the past. If so what were those results.
We know six more wrongs, will never correct the first,
and until some one is held responsible, and made
accountable, nothing good will come out of this mess.
It seems you all are in bed together. No one wants to
hold BUSH/CHENEY to account for their actions.
The UN has tried to make Israel responsible for their
evil actions, but is always vetoed by the USA.
If we don't bring fair, honest, & credible solutions to
the table. Which means holding the culprits to pay
for the injustice we all have witnessed, and you all
denied and continue to.
We know we will pay dearly for your mistakes,
Bush/Cheney mistakes, and Israel's mistakes,
simply because of your unwavering support
for a regime that is absolutely the worst in the
region.
We want America to be the America we knew,
prior to the ambush of AIPAC and other such
foreign influences.
Will any of you stand up for the principles of
consequence and truth...
Regardless, we Americans know the truth, and
when you all decide to face it, do something about
it.
We then will be behind you 150 %, but until that, the
captain is going down with his ship. Mission accomplished or not.

IT IS UP TO YOU, IF YOU ALL STAY IN DENIAL !!

Wednesday 28 September 2011

The LIGHT List




BY Nahida the Exiled Palestinian


( List of Intellectuals Gagged for Hunting the Truth )
Warning

Some "friends" of Palestine demanded the removal of the link to this Website from a pro-Palestinian Website, because the content of the Website are highly "controversial". Readers should consult their local "Thought Police" before embarking on reading, if you decide to proceed and read it anyway, you do so at your own risk, such "controversial" materials can cause some of your brain cell to suddenly ignite, which in turn might cause it to catch fire... BE WARNED

The approval of the "Thought Police" is always preferable, so you don't get in trouble with them, you don't want to find your name on their long, ever expanding list of "racists", "anti-Semites", Holocaust deniers" or conspiracy theorists":
It is ironic that some of the "Thought Police" themselves been victims of slander and smear campaign, where they have their names published in the SHIT list, yet they engage themselves in similar behaviour and use the same methods!

I would suggest to the "Thought Police", and they know who they are, if they still insist on following the sleazy methods of Zionist, to prepare their own smear list. To save them time, I would kick start it, and suggest that they call it the LIGHT List ( List of Intellectuals Gagged for Hunting the Truth )

This preliminary list would give them a good start:

NAME............................. "CRIME"

Gilad Atzmon ......................... "Holocaust denier" and "anti-Semite"

Professor Richard Falks.......... endorsed Gilad's book

Professor John Mearsheimer... endorsed Gilad's book

Professor William Cook ............. endorsed Gilad's book

Professor Francis Boyle........... for the FULL Liberation of Palestine

Professor James Petras...............endorsed Gilad's book

Professor William T. Hathaway..... endorsed Gilad's book

Ramzy Baroud ................................endorsed Gilad's book

Dr. Paul Larudee............................ endorsed Gilad's book

Dr. Samir Abed-Rabbo................ endorsed Gilad's book & shared a platform with him

Lauren Booth .......................... endorsed Gilad's book

Paul Eisen ..............................."Holocaust denier" and "anti-Semite"

Israel Shahak ........................ exposed supremacism in some Jewish ideology

Ken O’Keefe........................... endorsed Gilad's book

Israel Shamir......................... exposed supremacism in some Jewish ideology

Jeff Blankfort............................ endorsed Gilad's book

Anthony Lawson .....................exposes the role of Jewish-Zionist Lobby

Stuart Littlewoods...................... exposes the role of Jewish-Zionist Lobby

Eric Walberg ................................endorsed Gilad's book

Shahram Vahdany .......................endorsed Gilad's book

Jonathan Azaziah ........................ exposes the role of Jewish-Zionist Lobby and crimes

Helen Thomas ............................ for the Full Liberation of Palestine

Phillip Giraldi .............................. endorsed Gilad's book

Dr. Makram Khoury-Machool ....... endorsed Gilad's book

Dr. Kevin Barrett ............................. endorsed Gilad's book

Kathleen Christison.............................endorsed Gilad's book

Dr. Paul Balles ................................. endorsed Gilad's book & exposes Lobby

Dr Oren Ben Dor.............................. endorsed Gilad's book

Roy Ratcliffe.................................... endorsed Gilad's book

Reham Al Helsi.................................. for the FULL Liberation of Palestine

Alan Hart.......................................... shared a platform with Gilad Atzmon

Alison Weir..................................... exposes the role of Jewish-Zionist Lobby

Gideon Levy..................................... exposed supremacism in some Jewish ideology

Richard A. Siegel .......................... endorsed Gilad's book

Silvia Cattori ................................. endorsed Gilad's book

Sunny Singh ................................. endorsed Gilad's book

Jeff Gates ..................................... endorsed Gilad's book

Professor Garrison Fewell............. endorsed Gilad's book

Stephen Lendman.......................... exposes the role of Jewish-Zionist Lobby and crimes

Sameh Habeeb............................... endorsed Gilad's book

Kim Petersen ................................ endorsed Gilad's book

Richard Edmonson.......................exposes Jewish supremacism

If they wish so, they can add Nahida the exiled Palestinian to the LIGHT List, after getting approval of members in the solidarity Movement, but if some members who know Nahida personally disapprove, they can add "Nahida's articles" instead. As you know, Nahida and Nahida's articles are TWO totally unconnected entities, they have absolutely nothing in common.

Endorsements :
“Gilad Atzmon decided to open Pandora’s Box, and ignite a debate that has been frustratingly dormant for too long. His experiences are most authentic, views are hard-hitting, and, at times, provocative. It must be read and discussed.” Ramzy Baroud, Palestine Chronicle
"A transformative story told with unflinching integrity that all (especially Jews) who care about real peace, as well as their own identity, should not only read, but reflect upon and discuss widely." Professor Richard Falk
"Fascinating and provocative" Professor John J. Mearsheimer
"Atzmon’s insight into the organism created by the Zionist movement is explosive." Professor William A. Cook
"A pioneering work that deserves to be read and Gilad Atzmon is brave to write this book!" Dr. Samir Abed-Rabbo
“Gilad's escape from spiritual claustrophobia towards a free and open humanitarianism is fearless” Robert Wyatt
“In his inimitable deadpan style, Atzmon identifies the abscess in the Jewish wisdom tooth – exilic tribalism – and pulls it out. Ouch!” Eric Walberg, Al Aharam Weekly
“It is more than an academic exercise. It is a revelation!” Lauren Booth, Press TV
"A brilliant analysis that makes what appear to be contradictions in Jewish identity based political behavior not only comprehensible but predictable." Jeff Blankfort
"Atzmon has the courage - so profoundly lacking among Western intellectuals" Professor James Petras
“Having known Gilad for 25 years, I read the book in English, I heard it in Hebrew and reflected on it in Arabic. Gilad Atzmon is astonishingly courageous” Dr. Makram Khoury-Machool
“A fascinating achievement” Dr Oren Ben Dor
“Gilad Atzmon is someone who encompasses what it means to be an intellectual.” Kim Petersen, Dissident Voice
“Gilad Atzmon is the Moses of our time, calling all of us out of the Egypt of our boneheaded nationalisms and racialisms and exceptionalisms and chosen-people-isms toward some form of humanistic universalism.” Dr. Kevin Barrett
"Perhaps only a musician could have written this sensitive, perceptive lament over how so many Jews, believing themselves to be doing 'what is good for the Jews,' have managed to carve the heart out of the Palestinian nation and make this tragedy look like the natural order of things." Kathleen Christison
“Gilad's The Wandering Who? would have been a welcome delight to Albert Einstein just as it will be the irritating nemesis for Abe Foxman ideologues.” Dr. Paul Balles
“A book that will shake up a few people….” Gordon Duff
“Engaging, provocative and persuasive.’ Jeff Gates
“When you finish reading this book, you may likely as well see a different face in the mirror.” Professor Garrison Fewell
“The Wandering Who deconstructs the unique political identity that shapes the reality of the Jewish Nation and the crimes committed in its name. As a non-Jew, I found it illuminating!” Sameh Habeeb, Palestine Telegraph

"Gilad Atzmon probes the dilemmas Zionism has created for its adherents" Neil Berry, Arab News
"It is a very moving account that should be read by everyone." Silvia Cattori
“The Last Jewish Prophet” Professor William T. Hathaway
"Atzmon is an iconoclast.” Dr. Paul Larudee
"A brilliant, courageous study as well as critical reflection on Jewish ethnocentrism" Rainlore's World of Music
“Like all truth tellers of any merit Atzmon can expect the wrath of the powers that be and their minions as a reward for what he is exposing. People like Atzmon will have played a vital role in saving us from ourselves if indeed we do manage to survive. Love and respect to my brother Gilad Atzmon.” Ken O’Keefe
“The magical and yet extremely subtle gift that Gilad Atzmon offers through his personal journeys in The Wandering Who? is the wisdom of disillusionment.” Shahram Vahdany, MWC News
“Atzmon's writing respects no sacred cows. His wit is biting, his insight and logic compelling.” Richard A. Siegel
“Sometimes a brash, abrasive provocateur is what is required as a catalyst for genuine debate.” Sunny Singh
"This is a very perceptive and instructive book" Roy Ratcliffe
"The most accurate assessment to date on Jewish identity and political drive" Today's Jewsih Heroes

2 comments:

uprooted Palestinian said...
Edward C. Corrigan has been accused of being an anti-Semite because of his criticism of Israeli policies.
Simon Bolivar said...
I think it's a shame Uprooted Palestinians has been thrown on the shit-list.

Wednesday 21 September 2011

Concerning Mondoweiss, Racism and Freedom of Speech



These are articles by Philip Weiss ( calls himself progressive Jew, and the motto of his website "Mondoweiss The War of Ideas in the Middle East" )
Quote from the website:

Mondoweiss is a news website devoted to covering American foreign policy in the Middle East, chiefly from a progressive Jewish perspective.

It has four principal aims:

  • To publish important developments touching on Israel/Palestine, the American Jewish community and the shifting debate over US foreign policy in a timely fashion.

  • To publish a diversity of voices to promote dialogue on these important issues.

  • To foster the movement for greater fairness and justice for Palestinians in American foreign policy.

  • To offer alternatives to pro-Zionist ideology as a basis for American Jewish identity.


  • My Jewish Problem: Jewish Superiority, Jewish Elite


    "Still it is interesting that my friend and I shared a premise: Jews are superior; for whatever reason Jewish culture is superior in areas of modern civilized achievement"

    http://mondoweiss.net/2006/05/my_jewish_probl-2.html

    by Philip Weiss on May 10, 2006

    I went to a friend’s son’s bar mitzvah on Saturday and in some part because of my blog, and its discussion of Jewish politics, felt a little alienated. I forgot to get a yarmulke, then I ran to get one. I wondered who if anyone there had seen my ideas. Later, at the reception, I got into a discussion about these issues with an old friend, who was joined by a friend of his.
    My friend said he was a secular Jew and asked me how I define myself. An assimilating Jew, I said. Shortly after that, his friend said, I don’t know what an assimilating Jew is, and walked away.

    My friend is more intellectual. He said, What do you think will be lost if Jews assimilate into America? He answered his own question: the excellence that Jews have brought to any number of endeavors, science, the arts, finance, education, and so forth.
    I said, But what if these qualities are more widely shared with assimilation? Will our excellence pull up others’ mediocrity?

    He said, I think those qualities will be diluted. I.e., lost.
    I said I wondered if the process wasn’t inevitable. Jews are successful and prominent, and the more successful people get, the more sociological pressure there is on them to melt in, including pressure on their children to marry out. That is what happened to me. I went to the Ivy League because my family pushed me to excel and I met people who weren’t anti-Semitic. I liked the water.

    I had to admit to my friend my indifference as to whether the institutional element of my tribe persists. Religion may well be necessary to social structure and order, but we need some new ones. Pedophilia seems to be inherent to the Catholic church; and its hierarchy is covering it up. Islam has all kinds of problems, with free speech, patriarchalism, and the tolerance of violence. Indifference or disdain for Palestinian suffering seems inherent to the Jewish church. I don’t see why I should revere these institutions.

    Still it is interesting that my friend and I shared a premise: Jews are superior; for whatever reason Jewish culture is superior in areas of modern civilized achievement.
    In discussing My Jewish Problem on this blog, that’s a core Jewish value I would point to: Jewish exceptionalism. Belief in that idea underlies so much of Jewish social attitudes and achievement. (Maugham extols it in The Alien Corn; Hemingway throws it in Robert Cohn’s face in The Sun Also Rises). Larry Summers sought to broach the issue of Jewish innate intelligence in his notorious women-and-science speechof January 2005:
    …Catholics are substantially underrepresented in investment banking, which is an enormously high-paying profession in our society;… white men are very substantially underrepresented in the National Basketball Association; and… Jews are very substantially underrepresented in farming and in agriculture. These are all phenomena in which one observes underrepresentation, and I think it’s important to try to think systematically and clinically about the reasons for underrepresentation.
    Summers was bumping backwards into the fact of Jews as an elite. And, sociologically, Jewish achievement in the last generation is stunning. We entered the Establishment. A Jewish hedge fund guy who owns oil tankers chairs the American Enterprise Institute, the harbor to Mr. and Mrs. Cheney, and fount of bad ideas.

    That’s why this is a public issue: this elite has conducted itself at times in Jewish ways that deserve discussion. Specifically, the neoconservative promotion of a deluded disastrous war out of some degree of love for Israel, and the degree to which their agenda has been afforded political cover by the larger, liberal Jewish community—that is the heart of my interest. When you consider the overall failure of the Jewish intelligentsia and of Democratic politicians to even look at the way religious zealots on the West Bank are affecting American foreign policy, you have to ask, What does secular Judaism mean? Does it also have its faith-based ideologies?

    But outside of private conversations like the one I had at the bar mitzvah, these things are not discussed. Of course there is a reason for that. The last time Jews had such prominence in the life of societies, Europe in the first third of the last century, we know what happened. The Nazis pointed to the Jewish elite as a cause for extermination. So the Holocaust has acted as a ban on our even broaching the issue. Myself I don’t have any choice, it’s mine. It’s knit into the fabric of my life, from my tribal beginnings to my achievement phase as a youth, to my involvement in progressive ideas post 9/11.

    ==============================

    We’re just smarter, that’s why

    Over the weekend I watched Julius Genachowski, chairman of the Federal Communications Commission on CSPAN (talking about a good issue, phone companies stealing from their customers in quiet unauthorized ways) and I thought what I always think when I see Genachowski: I was once his boss.

    I was an editor at a New York journalism publication in the 1980s, and Julius was an intern or an assistant there for a time while he was an undergraduate at Columbia.
    My wife likes to point out here that I got fired from the job, and it was the last time I ever worked in an office. But I have a different point to make.
    I got hired to that job by an old friend, who just happened to be Jewish. The top editor of the publication also happened to be Jewish, and so did the managing editor (who was very pro-Israel). There was one editor who wasn't Jewish. Smart guy, and a poet. He used to say "neckbolt" a lot.

    Genachowski was Jewish, with European refugees survivors in his own family, I believe. And the guy who came in as an assistant editor after me, who I helped hire, was also Jewish.
    On CSpan the other day, Genachowski shared the stage with Sarah Rosen Wartell of the Center for American Progress and Joel Gurin, chief of the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau of the FCC. I'm guessing both are Jewish, but I don't know.
    Oh, and full disclosure: when I had a chance in 2008 to bring someone in as co-editor of this website, he was Jewish.

    My friends and I came of age during the meritocracy. Standardized tests and all that. No more quotas. A good thing, too. Only the meritorious would get ahead.

    But if you don't think kinship networks mean anything, well-- you can believe anything you like. I'm just too old to be that naive.


    Do Jews Dominate in American Media? And So What If We Do?

    by Philip Weiss on February 17, 2008

    http://mondoweiss.net/2008/02/do-jews-dominat.html
    At least a half dozen times in recent months, the suggestion has come from serious people that Jews predominate in the American media–that if we are not dominant, we are a major bloc. In a Yivo event on Jews in journalism I’ve blogged about, a questioner said that Jews’ outsize proportion in the media has granted us "a large influence over power." In his groundbreaking paper on the New York Times’s role in shaping American policy toward Israel, Jerome Slater spoke of "religious beliefs and identifications" that affected the Times, and cited former executive editor Max Frankel’s admission in his memoir (one also cited by Walt and Mearsheimer): "I was much more deeply devoted to Israel than I dared to assert."

    Lately broadcast reporter John Hockenberry related that he wanted to do a piece on the hijackers’ motivation after 9/11 but that NBC executive Jeff Zucker scotched the notion:
    "Maybe," Zucker said, "we ought to do a series of specials on
    firehouses where we just ride along with our cameras. Like the show Cops,
    only with firefighters."… [H]e could make room in the
    prime-time lineup for firefighters, but then smiled at me and said, in
    effect, that he had no time for any subtitled interviews with jihadists


    raging about Palestine. [Weiss's emphasis]
    Then last month at a forum at the Nixon Center, former Bushie Dov Zackheim said, Jews don’t dominate the policy-making process, but the media is a different story…
    I don’t know that anyone has visited the simple question raised by these statements: Do Jews dominate the media? This is something I know about personally. I’ve worked in print journalism for more than 30 years. I’ve worked for many magazines and newspapers, and for a time my whole social circle was editors and writers in New York. I don’t know television. I don’t know Washington journalism well. I don’t know the west coast. My sample is surely skewed by the fact that I’m Jewish and have always felt great comfort with other Jews. But in my experience, Jews have made up the majority of the important positions in the publications I worked for, a majority of the writers I’ve known at these place, and the majority of the owners who have paid me. Yes my own sample may be skewed, but I think it shows that Jews make up a significant proportion of power positions in media, half, if not more.

    Before considering what this means, let me make my experience concrete:

    My serious journalism began at the Harvard Crimson in the 70s. A friend said the paper was a Jewish boys club; it was dominated by middle class Jews– as apparently today there are a lot of Asians. Many of these Jews are now powerful presences in the media. Zucker is one of them. My first paying job was in Minneapolis. Five Harvard guys started a weekly; four of them were Jewish, including the publisher paying our meager salaries. I remember our editor walking the halls parodying the jingle we had on the radio. The jingle went: "We’ve got the news, we’ve got the sports…" He sang it as “We’ve got the Jews, we’ve got the sports.” Funny.

    I was hired by a Jewish editor at my next job, the Philadelphia Daily News in 1978, and when I started freelancing in 1981, Jewish Harvard friends got me work at the Columbia Journalism Review and the Washington Monthly. A gentile brought me in at Harper’s and the New Republic. It was at the New Republic, a launching pad for any number of highly-successful journalists, that I briefly associated with Marty Peretz, and did a story for him mocking the United Nations, whose judgment he seeks at every turn to nullify because the U.N. is critical of Israel.

    Fast forward. In New York, I have worked for a dozen magazines. Most of my editors have been Jewish. Both my book publishers were Jewish. At one point at one publishing house, the editor, his boss, and her boss were all Jewish, and so was the lawyer vetting the work—I remember her saying she would never travel to Malaysia because of the anti-Semitic Prime minister. Oh–and the assistant editor was half-Jewish.

    I should point out that I have worked with many gentile editors and writers, and I have never been aware of any employment discrimination against them (though I may not be the best source). In fact, at Spy, the three top editors were all non-Jews and when I used the epithet WASP it was removed from my copy. But that is the exception. Generally it’s been Jews Jews Jews. When I hear NPR do a piece with its top political team and both are Jews…

    when a Jewish friend calls me and gossips about lunches with two top news execs at major publications who are both Jewish and who I’ve known for 20 years… when a Jewish editor friend tells me that Si Newhouse would be disturbed if Vanity Fair editor Graydon Carter– who has done such courageous work against the Iraq war– did anything to expose the Israel lobby… and when I say that my income has been derived overwhelmingly from Jewish-owned publications for years—this is simply the ordinary culture of the magazine business as I know it.

    I have some ideas why Jews have predominated, but that’s not the purpose of this posting. Last year Senator Russ Feingold, buttonholed on CSPAN about why so many speakers on air were Jewish, said, “Well, we’re good at talking…” That’ll do for now.

    The real issue is, Does it matter? Most of my life I felt it didn’t. It’s just the way it is, at this point in history. It will change (as Clyde Haberman pointed out at that Yivo event). Jews are the latest flavor of the establishment. In his landmark book, The Jewish Century, Slezkine reports that Jews were the majority of journalists in Berlin and Vienna and Prague, too, in the late 1800s, if I remember correctly.
    Now I think it does matter, for two reasons. Elitist establishment culture, and Israel. As to elitism, I worry when any affluent group has power and little sense of what the common man is experiencing. I feel the same discomfort with my prestige-oriented "caste" that E. Digby Baltzell did with his calcified caste, the WASPs–when he called for an end to discrimination against Jews in the early ’60s. The values of my cohort sometimes seem narrow: globalism, prosperity, professionalism. In Israel the values are a lot broader. None of my cohort has served in the military, myself included. A lot of our fathers did; but I bet none
    of our kids do. Military service is for losers–or for Israelis.
    So we are way overrepresented in the chattering classes, and way underrepresented in the battering classes. Not a great recipe for leadership, especially in wartime. Then there’s Israel. Support for Israel is an element of Jewish religious practice and more important, part of the Jewish cultural experience. Even if you’re a secular Jewish professional who prides himself on his objectivity, there is a ton of cultural pressure on you to support Israel or at least not to betray Israel. We are talking about a religion, after all, and the pressures faced by Jews who are critical of Israel are not that different from what Muslim women who want greater freedom undergo psychically or by evangelical Christians who want to support gay rights. It is worth noting that great Jewish heretics on the Israel question suffer anger or even ostracism inside their own families. Henry Siegman talked about this on Charlie Rose once, I recall–that even close family were not speaking to him over Israel. And I have seen this for myself on numerous occasions. There is not a lot of bandwidth on this issue. Conversations about Israel even inside the liberal Jewish community are emotionally loaded, and result in people not speaking to one another. I lost this blog at a mainstream publication because the editor was Jewish and conservative on Israel and so was the new owner, and the publisher had worked for AIPAC. And all of them would likely call themselves liberal Democrats.

    As former CNN correspondent Linda Scherzer has said, "We, as Jews, must understand that we come with a certain bias …We believe in the Israeli narrative of history. We support the values that we as Americans, Westerners, and Jews espouse. Thus, we see news reporting through our own prism."

    There are many American Jewish journalists who have done great independent work re Israel/Palestine. Richard Ben Cramer and the late Robbie Friedman leap to mind. But both these guys are exceptional, and had to overcome/ignore a ton of pressure that most of us would quail under. They had to step outside the Jewish family to do their work…

    The result is that Americans are not getting the full story re Israel/Palestine. Slater says this dramatically in his paper–that the Times has deprived American leadership of reporting on the moral/political crisis that Israel is undergoing, one that Haaretz has covered unstintingly. At Columbia the other night, Jew, Arab and gentile on a panel about the human-rights crisis in Gaza all said that Americans are not getting the full story. Ilan Pappe has marveled in his book The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, that the Nakba is all but unmentioned in the U.S.–while Haaretz has sought at times to document it, for instance a former officer saying in 2004 that if he had not helped to destroy 200 villages in southern Israel in ’48, there would be another million Palestinians in Israel. To repeat Scherzer’s admission: "We believe in the Israeli narrative of history…"

    Why does the American press behave differently from the Israeli press? I think the answer is guilt. The Jewish cohort of which I am a part has largely accepted the duty that Max Frankel felt, of supporting Israel. This duty is rarely interrogated, and yet consciously or not we all know that American public opinion/leadership is critical to Israel’s political invulnerability; and we think that if we take their fingers out of the dike, who knows what will happen. That is a ton of responsibility. This responsibility is not executed with special care.

    Generally, my cohort hasn’t been to Israel, hasn’t seen the West Bank. But they do feel kinship with Israeli Jews, and–above all–have guilt feelings about the Holocaust, or the American Jewish silence about
    it during the event, the Jewish passivity; and they are determined not to be passive during Israel’s neverending existential crises. And thus they misunderstand Israel and fail to serve their readers.

    ****

    nahida's comment:


    "Jewish Superiority, Jewish Elite" is indeed his/their problem NOT anyone else's, but when I feel disturbed by it, and when I look at it objectionably and in disbelief, does that make me a racist??


    The same Philip Weiss , the progressive, who is struggling with his problem of "Jewish superiority and Jewish elite" described what it means to be Jewish to him using the very disturbing words:


    "Tribalism", "Jewish Self-interest", "Us-ness", "Distinction to them", "Sense of Difference", and an "Elite Identity"


    Philip Weiss, the progressive, also admitted that his anti-zionist stance is “concerned with a Jewish self-interest”. Then he elaborated: “A theory of political life based on altruism or concern for victims purely is doomed to fail.”


    Philip Weiss, the progressive, who claims that "Islam has all kinds of problems, with free speech, patriarchalism, and the tolerance of violence", sees it perfectly OK to ban a Palestinian Muslim from commenting on his "progressive" website, it appears that as far as Mr. Philip Weiss's concerned, I am not a member of his "elite tribe", and my voice does not particularly serve his "Jewish self-interest", therefore, censoring my comments and muffling my voice is not much of a worry to him.


    Heck, I am only a Palestinian, you know, one of those who "don't exist" and whose homeland "never existed", and the principle of freedom of speech does not apply to them.


    How ironic to read this call for "give us your money" kind of thing on Philip's website: "Help Mondoweiss Break the Media Blockade" while at the same time he actively participates in blocking an authentic Palestinian voice.

    He IS part of the media blockade, and his slogan aught to be "Help Mondoweiss Enforce the Media Blockade"


    This is the email that was sent to Philip after he censored my comments, he did NOT have the politeness to even acknowledge the email with a response:
    Quote:

    Dear Philip I would like to ask a direct question: are you censoring a Palestinian voice? or is it just a routine slow moderating methods? I have posted these comments on your website, but apparently, whomever is moderating the site chose to mute a Palestinian voice.

    I find this rather shocking, specially when your site presents itself as a "progressive", which deals with the "war of ideas in the ME". to be frank and honest, I am sick and tired of people who pretend to be supporters, pretending to speak for the sake of, and on behalf of Palestinians, yet at the same time muting our faint voices even in the comment section!

    These are the comments that are CENSORED at Mondoweiss:


    Quote:

    First comment:

    The article that has prompted this interview with Philip was Jewish Voice for Peace? Really?? .

    Second comment:

    and for more info about the ideology that I talked about earlier:

    The worm is in the can

    Supremacist and Racist

    Chabad Chabad around the world

    BEHOLD WORLD.. BREAKING NEWS

    NO... This is not a Synagogue

    Meet the Rebbe

    Chabad Lubavitch & the zionist Law-Makers

    Why the Rebbe hates Islam?

    World Leaders and the Rebbe

    chabad in US Senate & congress

    Meet the Jewish Settlers

    Sharing Our House with Settlers


    Third comment:

    "This presentation uncovers the side of Jewish-zionist-Israeli face that is kept carefully hidden from the general public. I present it here in all its ugliness, for the sake of truth and truth-seekers.

    Disclaimer: Quoting people and books is NOT antisemitism

    A “Benign” culture with “Benign individuals”!

    3 comments:

    john said...
    I posted a comment waited for it to be moderated now can't find it. Palestinian lady; can you help me? Weiss erases my comments on his site.
    john said...
    Found last post!

    Your comment is awaiting moderation.
    Back in 2000 before chabad org died for a year “computer problem” said webmaster there was article explaining crossing-red-sea story. Picture egypt as head, redsea as neck and holy land as body. Head is enslaved with addictions. Neck(vocal cords reflecting internal dialogue) seperates head from body. Goal of re-ligion( latin spelling of re-connection) is to reconnect head and body.
    When chabad org came back all the useful psyche stuff was gone and in its place were such as “giving up one Sq. centimeter of Israel is kicking sand in g-d’s face.” Some day someone will level with US about the takeover of chabad

    Exciting, the possibility of communicating with a Palestinian! Perhaps someone here remembers chabad .org before zion/charon took it over in '00
    david said...
    nice post Nahida, some very good observations and interesting questions.

    you might be amused by my recent 'translation' of the statement by Philip Weiss and Adam Horowitz announcing their new hyprertribal editorial policy on comments.

    http://www.deliberation.info/edelweiss-mondoweiss-rip/

    Tuesday 20 September 2011

    Thought Terrorism

    "Facts" do NOT need laws to enforce, validate or defend them, what they require is research to examine their narrative and correct it for better accuracy and understanding.



    In defence of freedom of speech, freedom of thought, freedom of expression and freedom to access information

    Some wants us to believe that:

    "Ignorance Is Strength",

    "Restricting the boundaries of discussion expands Knowledge",

    “Crucifying intellectuals is Progressive”

    “Shunning people for their thoughts and opinions is Revolutionary”

    “Thinking independently is very Dangerous”

    “Reading many sources affects the protocols of Health and Safety”

    "Framing the Debate is Good… very very good",

    “Gagging is strategically crucial for gaining Wisdom”

    "Suppressing of Information helps to uncover the Truth"

    "Revising Historical narratives is a Crime, and should be Punished by Law"

    "Following the Evidence is a Conspiracy Theory"

    "Investigating a Crime is not Helpful, it's a Distraction"

    "Crying against Racism and Supremacy is anti-Semitism"

    “Exposing the power-elite is Racist”

    "Thought Terrorism leads to Truth and Justice" (somehow, eventually) !

    And of course, “no mater what, the Earth is still Flat, flat as a thin crispy pancake”

    All you have to do is to Believe!

    Otherwise face the consequences of your “blasphemy and wickedness”, be prepared for the burning of your reputation at the stake of their Omniscience, and be prepared for the crucifying of your character at the altar of their omnipotence and self-righteousness.



    Those who have experienced working in the media or in the solidarity movements know only too well the amount of pressure exerted upon them and anyone who tries to get some information out about what is happening in occupied Palestine, the history of Palestine, or the narrative as experienced by Palestinians.

    The level of gagging is all too immense, all too intense, all too widespread, all too familiar to be passed unnoticed; cancellation of events, termination of academic courses, stopping artistic plays and children dances and exhibitions… the list is endless.

    Zionists exert incalculable pressure to suppress the dissemination of information, to confuse and silence truth and to control public opinion in order to dissuade people away from making the right informed choice. Zionists who indulge in this kind of suppression which became their very own trademark, have simultaneously and deceitfully continued to accuse of Muslims of exactly that which they are doing, i.e being "enemies of free speech" and “haters of freedom". Accusing others of their own crimes, as we have seen repeatedly, is their modus operandi

    Having said that, one can still find solace in the fact that those who practice such methods of suppression are doing so in line with their doctrine, philosophy and practice, in fact suppressing and concealing information by Zionists neither contradicts their racist belief system, nor their colonial mindset, as ugly as it might be, it is to be expected from oppressors and occupiers.




    What comes as a shock and utter blow is to see such behaviour coming from liberals, progressives and activists who hold the banner of freedom, equality and justice and who work tirelessly to achieve those principles.

    It is inconceivable to imagine that amidst those who have endless sleepless nights working to ensure that humanity would one day reach a level of ethical evolution that treats every single human being with justice and equality, that amidst those who work to ensure that all people are held by the same standard and equity before the law, that amidst those who embrace mankind with love and compassion they all deserve, it is inconceivable to see some amidst them resorting to similar methods of suppression of information and discrimination between people!

    During my work with the movement, I came to realize that within our folks there are some who have absolutely zero tolerance to any views that does not match theirs, and they are willing to go as far as it takes to smother and conceal that which they disapprove of or disagree with.

    The first uncomfortable observation came when I learned of the categorization of people; such and such person is liberal and forward thinking, this organization is progressive, but that group is reactionary, and those people are backwards thinking.

    Although in our day and age, critical thinking is viewed as an acceptable if not essential part of human progress, and although no dogma should be immune against healthy scrutiny, no philosophy should have total impunity or be elevated beyond the realm of genuine debate, yet you come to learn that there exist one untouchable ideology that is set up above and beyond any and all criticism.

    You come to learn that for some:
    No description can be attached to the word "Jewish" except of course in the context of praise, adoration and glorification. All people, all faiths and all races have the good and the bad amongst them, except of course those of the Jewish faith or Jewish background, who unlike the rest of humanity, can only emanate righteousness, nothing but holiness and pure goodness radiate out of them. All ideologies and all beliefs are subjects to scrutiny, examination and evaluation, except of course for the Jewish ideology, this is above any criticism. Should any ill creed or ill behaviour oozes out to the public sphere, it has to immediately be glued to the word “Zionism”, the true villain, which has absolutely nothing to do with Jewish ideology or the Judaic faith. In fact it is an unforgivable sin to use the word "Jewish" associated with anything negative, the word has to be snapped away as a matter of urgency and replaced with "Zionism", otherwise one would qualify as an staunch anti--Semite.

    Have you ever heard of academic studies about the relationship between Jewish ideology and Zionism, except that which are designed to tear to pieces and sever any links between the two, and present them as worlds-apart mortal enemies and polarized opposites which have absolutely nothing in common?

    To say “excuse me but…” immediately throws you in the abyss, makes you a loathed outcast, a vile anti-Semite, excommunicated by the gurus of thought control and perhaps stalked for the rest of your life.

    As for revising history and re-examining documented chronological events, though to their credit, activists rejoice in digging out facts and celebrate the updating and the new reading of the Nakba, but the logic of some of them flips upside-down, their brain shuts off, their grey-matter turns into mush and their common sense turn into ice cubes, as they fail to apply the same principles when it comes to revising an almost simultaneous chapter of history, namely the Holocaust. To them the holocaust is no longer an historical event to be studied and scholarly examined like any other event or narrative. The perception of the Holocaust is no longer ruled by rationality nor is it subject to what other historical event are subject to, rather it is an untouchable sacred ideology to be revered, an unquestionable dogma to be hailed, made holy and glorified.

    Isn't there in the more recent events of 9/11, a living history in the making which we are still choking with its bitter fruit now, isn't there a good example of how things can be written or miss-written?

    Those who dare to mumble “excuse me but…” not only they are persecuted, heavily fined and imprisoned by the establishment, but also vilified by some liberals, defenders of freedom, seekers of truth and agents for justice. The unfortunate souls who naively happen to ask the most innocent question would be struck out from the flock of humanity into the space of loneliness and darkness designated for ghosts, creeps and vampires, accused of the worst crime ever known to man, and stamped with the red bold label, "holocaust deniers", as the lowest of the low of mankind.


    Now, please, hold your horses and don’t pull out that gluey outdated card; defending the right of people to freely conduct historical or scientific research without fear of persecution and excommunication, defending the right of affected people to independently investigate crimes, and defending the right of people to have access to information and the right of people to make informed choices and decisions, defending all this is a basic human right.

    No one is entitled to smear or stick their label on intellectuals and researchers who call for the freedom of speech, the freedom to access information and liberation of intellect, as long as it is done in a non-insulting, honest and academic manner.

    Sticking labels, smearing and branding people as a method to gain audience, make a point or win an argument, resembles only the Zionists methods and their fascist techniques. Such methods belong outside any peace and justice movement.

    The inability or unwillingness to face the moral and intellectual challenges, which are presented and supported with massive wealth of information and documented evidence, reflects only logical impotence, ethical paralysis and academic incompetence.

    A very dear and respected friend of mine put it Succinctly "Analysis and evaluation should be thorough and ongoing, however painful the results. So everything from Zionism to the Holocaust, 9/11, Middle-Eastern wars, Media ownership, political representation of communities within society etc are legitimate areas for constant review"

    When people stand on solid grounds, when their case is just, when they can argue their standpoint and defend their position, why do they feel the need to limit the discussion and the urge to smother information?


    The vital question that each and every soul that loves the truth should ask and ponder upon:

    Why do some people fear knowledge and feel threatened by it?